Author road · 12 Stations · 12 days · Mind & Psychology › Psychology
Think with Jonathan Haidt's tools
12 Stations through Haidt's two books, from the rider and the elephant to why good people disagree, ending in a one-page plan for a real disagreement with a colleague who sees it differently.
We do not re-summarise The Happiness Hypothesis; it has its own road. We connect two books: its rider, elephant and sources of happiness, then The Righteous Mind on why decent colleagues judge the same decision differently: intuitions first, six moral foundations, values that bind and blind. The order is a teaching order designed by BookYol, not the author's own.
The road, station by station
01The rider and the elephant
~5 minfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
Today’s Station — start →
02Retrain a pessimistic elephant, one thought at a time
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
03Why More Will Not Do It
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
04Happiness Comes from Between
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
05Tit for tat with a warm start
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
06Catch moments of elevation and awe
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
Milestone
The elephant trained, happiness found between
One cue the elephant meets has been changed, one distorted thought rewritten, the next 'more' weighed against a renewing activity, three people given a day, one small kindness offered first, and one moment of elevation turned into an act.
07The log in your own eye
lockedfrom The Happiness Hypothesis
08Intuitions come first, reasons second
lockedfrom The Righteous Mind
09Six taste receptors of the moral mind
lockedfrom The Righteous Mind
10Shared values bind a team, and blind it
lockedfrom The Righteous Mind
11The hive switch: when we outweighs me
lockedfrom The Righteous Mind
12Speak to the elephant first
lockedfrom The Righteous Mind
Milestone
Destination: a disagreement prepared for the elephant
One real disagreement at work is prepared on one page: your own instant verdict and what would change it, the foundation each side speaks from, what your team treats as sacred, the part of the other view you accept, and the question you will ask first.
